Reformation
Canterbury, England
English Reformation (Anglican)
Executed
Also: Thomas Cranmer
The architect of the English Reformation, who became Archbishop of Canterbury in 1533. ⚠ Olson judges that his doctrine of salvation was almost exactly the same as that of the continental Reformers Luther, Zwingli and Calvin — the only differences being his emphasis on James and on sanctification. With the other English Reformers he rejected Roman Catholic sacerdotalism, and he also rejected the idea that, as Olson puts it, only a priest can forgive people's sins and that in the Mass Christ is offered up again as a sacrifice.
Below: first his own position, then the church’s verdict — kept separate. A rejected opinion keeps equal weight here.
His own position
His commitment to justification by grace alone through faith is set out with complete clarity in his Homily on Salvation (1547) — which, as Olson notes, broke new ground and became the official teaching of the Church of England. He criticized and condemned the Roman Catholic doctrine that, in Olson's summary, gives or infuses righteousness into people through faith, sacraments and merit. He held, as Olson reports, that our justification comes freely from the mercy of God, not because of any good work we have done, but only on the ground of a true and lively faith, which even so is still the gift of God.
⭐⭐ The one thing he should most be remembered for on this thread: on James he was the exact opposite of Luther. Olson states it plainly: unlike Luther, Cranmer thought very highly of the Letter of James, and held that its message does not conflict with Paul's teaching on salvation. As Olson gives his words: a faith that brings forth evil works (without repentance), or no good works, is not a right, pure and lively faith, but a dead, devilish, false and counterfeit faith, as St Paul and St John say. ⚠ Look carefully at how he did it: he kept the same Protestant principle, but put the qualifier true and lively into the very definition of faith — and so James was no longer a problem but a support. In this he also set a pattern for later Anglican theologians: sanctification is a lifetime of holiness and good works, which, as Olson puts it, flows naturally out of the true and lively faith by which one is justified, and is bound to come out of it.
The church’s verdict
⚠ His death has to be read together with his theology. During the Catholic restoration under Mary I, Olson records, under painful torment and the threat of death, the Archbishop of Canterbury and architect of English Protestantism declared that he gave up his heresy and was willing to embrace the Roman faith again — yet he was still condemned to death. ⭐ When he was publicly burned on 21 March 1556, Olson writes, Cranmer stretched the hand that had signed the recantation out over the blazing fire, as a sign that he took back that recantation. We record this as it stands, without dramatizing it — but we ask readers to notice: a man who taught all his life that faith without works is a dead faith paid, in the end, for his own shrinking back with that very hand.
What was at stake for salvation
He wanted to hold two things at once: justification comes wholly and freely from the mercy of God, and faith must be alive. ⭐ His way was not to compromise between the two but to redefine faith — a dead faith is not faith at all.
Principal works
-
Homily on Salvation 1547
A Homily on Salvation; ⭐ became the Church of England's official teaching on justification
-
Defence of the True and Catholic Doctrine of the Sacrament
Defence of the True and Catholic Doctrine of the Sacrament
Threads he belongs to
Justification
Dispute Counterclaim ⭐⭐ On James he was the exact opposite of Luther — he valued it very highly and held that James and Paul do not conflict. His way was to put true and lively into the definition of faith.